Can’t a person just mean multiple things at once?
(Yes, the answer is yes.)
1. Not talking to people is an actual solution, even if it’s not for everyone.
(Properly functioning Ne thinks of all the solutions, not just the good ones!)
While the ENTP in question seemed to be searching for a pro-active method to improve their situation (commendable!), I, myself try to avoid spending a lot of time in person attempting to communicate ideas to people who do not know me well.* It is ridiculously exhausting when you don’t have a common language of understood things to refer back to. So yes, joke, but actually sort of not. I hear avoidance is not the best way to solve your problems, though, even if the temporary rush of peace and quiet is nice.
2. Having an N type interpreter is actually really useful and also has the pleasant side-effect of making you feel more comfortable talking to people, if that is something that makes you anxious.
What I am talking about is a buffer. Solution 2 is a buffer. Or like, a partner if you’re in a work context.
But seriously, make sure that this a real person with their own fleshy meat suit, not a spirit anything. Always keep in mind that your goal is to be less confusing. If you are interacting with a non-entity on top of making drastic intuitive leaps, you are not achieving your goal. (Joke. But also – it worries me somewhat that this was your takeaway.)
Technically your interpreter/buffer/partner doesn’t even have to be an N-type, just someone who can reliably follow what you’re trying to say and see where you’re losing the other person. If that’s an S-type, more power to them! Carrying them is a joke (I mean, I guess you can if that seems like a good idea?), but you should probably think about compensating them if you’re going to use their services often, maybe with friendship, or baked goods, or a salary and a job title.
3. & 4. Points 3 and 4 were, sadly, not jokes.
* Maybe the difference between E and I is how long we’ll try to explain a thing out loud before giving up.**
**(a joke)