IZ: Too cool? He could also have been an ESTP? He was an activist? INFJs and ENFJs are not very in-your-face activists. Is Mag Ruffman going to anger the Romans by enthusiastically promoting the trades? No, she is very obviously really nice and just scary/inept with a chainsaw. The Romans would have had trouble taking NFJ anger seriously. They obviously took Jesus seriously. He seemed to really enjoy debate? The Romans clearly did not appreciate this about him. He had followers? People tend to follow people with whom they strongly relate. There are more STPs than NFJs and you could argue that STPs are more relatable leaders to more people. More people who present themselves using self-aggrandizing names like “Son of God” (sarcastically or seriously)  are in the ESTP tag; for example, Kanye West (Yeezus), Madonna (Madonna).

MS:  Also the aesthetic – I am not up on the context of the long hair/robes/sandals vibe for the time, but it’s not a very J-type look. Agreed that he could have been an ESTP.  (Actually, that is probably more likely.)

IZ: She seems to have high extroverted thinking. She has stiff, awkward body movement. She is very cagey and quick witted when put on the spot and a lot smarter than the press often made her out to be. Consider most successful Princesses by marriage are ESTJs and ESFJs.

IZ: That sounds like a time-consuming, large-scale study.

MS: I tend to think most of the big misconceptions are less about people not getting other people and more about basing information on people who are not well typed. 

(Says the person salty enough to run a blog about it…)

IZ: Since they were on the same show and may be viewed together, often and in similar contexts, how about David Schwimmer and Matthew Perry? 

MS: There’s also a set of brothers: Nathaniel and Simon Rich, although I don’t think they appear in videos together.

IZ: What people find funny may also be personal, contextual, culturally learned, etc., and not only type specific.